Redmond Diary

Blog archive

A Windows Phone-CES Post Mortem

I attend the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) to follow and cover Microsoft, both in terms of its announcements at the show, and those of its competitors. From that standpoint, and since Microsoft announced that this year’s CES would be its last, I attended again this year and I think it was the best CES Microsoft’s had since I started attending. But the reasons for that are unexpected and surprising. Let me give you a little more context and explain why.

Microsoft has, since 1998, delivered the kickoff keynote for the entire CES conference, and has typically used it to make important announcements. For example, when I attended my first CES in 2009, Microsoft used the keynote to announce the the Windows 7 beta. The company has also used past keynotes to show off Project Natal (which became Kinect) and at last year’s kickoff, Microsoft announced Windows on ARM.

So over the fall, I expected big things from this year’s keynote, like the Windows 8 beta announcement and/or something around the "Tango" or “Apollo” releases of Windows Phone. But in the run up to the show, we learned that the Windows 8 beta wouldn’t be out until February, we got fairly clear indications that Windows Phone technology announcements wouldn’t be on the agenda and then Microsoft announced that 2012 would be its last year at CES.

Correspondingly, I expected very little out of the Microsoft keynote. And in terms of news, very little is what we got. I mean, sure, Ryan Seacrest anchored the event, and there was a roster of smaller announcements (if you want, you can read about them in my special Redmond Roundup @ CES dispatch). But the keynote’s Windows Phone, Windows 8 and Xbox/Kinect demos were basically encore presentations from the Windows Phone 7.5 launch, //build/ and E3.

But somehow, things seemed to come together for Microsoft at this CES. To begin with, Nokia announced its Lumia 900 Windows Phone handset, for release this Spring on AT&T. It did so at its own, somewhat low-key press conference downstairs from, and a few hours before, Microsoft’s keynote. The phone looked great and response was very positive. Nokia also made official the immediate availability of the Lumia 710 on T-Mobile USA for $49.99. Steve Ballmer joined Nokia’s CEO Stephen Elop on stage for part of this press conference, and I think it was pivotal for Microsoft.

I didn’t really appreciate that fully until during the show. Nokia’s booth was very busy, and its Windows Phone handsets were everywhere. Even at the displays where Nokia was showing its mobile audio accessories, the sound sources were 710 and 800 handsets. It’s as if the company were changing its name from Nokia to Lumia.

Lumia represents much more than robust support for the platform by an OEM. When I went by the booth and watched a few demos, I realized that Nokia’s Lumia 800 and 900 phones don’t just run Windows Phone, they transform it. The software doesn’t change, mind you, but the context has changed completely. Those handsets are so elegant, and Nokia is so unequivocally committed to Windows Phone, that suddenly it shines. Pride replaces caveats, beauty replaces clunky-ness, excitement replaces postponed hope and, for the attendees of CES, interest replaced cynicism and condescension.

With Android receding to hum-drum, commodity status at this CES and the iOS ecosystem devices seeming less prominent as well, Windows Phone seemed to have the “it” status. No wonder Joe Belfiore, Brandon Watson and others from the Windows Phone team looked so happy at the keynote.

And perhaps most interesting, that Windows Phone buzz seemed to have created anticipation around Windows 8. It’s long been my suspicion that, when released, Windows 8 will lend gravitas and momentum to Windows Phone. But I never really considered that this booster effect could work in both directions. Add-in the “Ultrabook” laptops displayed by a number of vendors at CES, and things are looking surprisingly positive for Microsoft. And all this during its final, understated year at the show.

Microsoft’s CES keynote did do one thing quite boldly: it presented Metro as the company’s key value proposition. That makes a lot of sense. Metro is non-derivative; it builds on Microsoft’s versatility across contexts (work at the office, gaming/entertainment in the living room and a combination of the two while mobile); and with the right partners having the right focus, execution can be elegant, compelling and open.

Redmond still has a huge fight on its hands, but it seems to be finding a certain peace with itself, building good technology, letting its partners do the talking, providing value to the enterprise and proving its mettle at a consumer event. Now it needs to sustain this momentum, and continue to be patient.

Posted by Andrew J. Brust on 01/12/2012 at 6:40 PM


Reader Comments:

Thu, Jan 26, 2012

Actually I find Windows Phone easy to develop for. The tools and languages used are great and I have not found it buggy or frustrating at all. It seems highly unlikely to me that the reason Angry Birds costs more on Windows Phone is due to development time spent. Angry Birds should have been easy to port to Windows Phone. I think the reason it costs more is because there are not a lot of Windows Phone devices out there compared to other devices, therefore to make it worth it to port over, they need to make more money per sale. Not only that, but there is less competition on Windows Phone compared to other devices with more games available. That is another reason they can get away with charging more.

Wed, Jan 18, 2012 JAM

I refuse to buy a phone that is locked to the single store. It does not matter if the store offers free applications. It is a matter of principle. I will stick with Android as long as Windows of Apple phone is open to applications that are offered outside of the store.

Tue, Jan 17, 2012

Re: "Why the push on 'apps'". I work in photography and cinematography and CG. Go to almost any related website and you'll find references to iPhone (and some Android) apps: depth of field calculators for every known lens, inclinometers to measure the angle of the camera, apps to control lighting, apps to calculate and show the angle of sun and moon at any given time and date and place, apps to remotely control exposure and other settings of many cameras, apps to remotely control mechanical booms and heads, apps for clients to review shots as they are taken and to view footage streaming off of cameras, location scouting apps, on and on. These aren't toy apps, but useful tools supplied by professional developers and organizations. And that's now true for almost every industry. Virtually none of this exists for WinPhone. Those 50,000 WinPhone apps ARE mostly toys/games (even many that pretend to be otherwise), from unreliable/unknown sources, and that's the problem.

Tue, Jan 17, 2012

People keep talking about Windows 8 as if it's one OS. It isn't. Even on the same physical box, the Metro-lated tablet version is completely firewalled off from the desktop Win7-like side. Can't even share files between them on the same box except through the cloud. The Tablet side will require all new apps, which can only be purchased through the MS App Store. Metro may look "pretty" (to some), but it also sucks up screen real estate: makes its use within apps very inefficient and often cumbersome. Microsoft's concentration on "lifestyle" (i.e. consumer) use is at odds with and at the cost of effective business use, security, etc. Other than finally having a decent looking platform on which to run WinPhone, nothing that happened at CES has changed these underlying problems with Microsoft's strategy.

Tue, Jan 17, 2012 Tim Stone Trabuco Canyon, CA

I wonder why all the push on "apps". My Windows 7 phone is a very important tool, and there is nothing I need to do that I can't accomplish with the included apps, and perhaps a few of the available supplements. Its just not a toy for me. I see all the apps on iOS, but I rarely see one that I really need, and most have little practical purpose or staying power. What I want, and I get with WP7 and Office 365, is a highly reliable phone, messaging and email system with some access to documents on the fly. I also appreciate the information services provided by Bing, mapping, and the integrated social networking.

Mon, Jan 16, 2012

From a developer standpoint I'd hoped that MS would reveal more about win Phone 7 upcoming releases. It is a nice UI when you getting it working, but it still has a lot of bugs and can be frustrating to develop on. If you don't believe me, just compare the price of Angry Birds apps on Andriod, IOS and Win Phone 7. The cost diff has to be down to the development time spent. I talk from experience

Sat, Jan 14, 2012

The Lumia 900 looks awesome. I love Windows Phone-- the UI is unmatched and I like the Xbox Live features and hope to see more integration in that area. There is already an Xbox companion app which is cool but I would love to see games where you use the phone in conjunction with the Xbox console itself during a game.

Fri, Jan 13, 2012 john papa Orlando, FL

Nice write-up Andrew. I'm closely watching Microsoft and the reception to their Phone strategy. As I detailed in my "challenges" article, I find the biggest issues are apps and the "cool" factor. I love the UX. I am hoping that the Lumia 900 will be the catalyst that puts WP in the cool category for consumers. Because if consumers want it, the apps will follow.

Add Your Comment:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above